Friday, April 24, 2009

All Children Left Behind


The education system in this country is broken and it's going to take BIG ideas to make the necessary corrections. I have been concerned about the way we do schools for some time and now more than ever since my children are entering them. Education has become big business, not only at the graduate level but also at the grade school level both public and private. Any time motivation points toward dollars and cents and the pursuit to collect heaping mounds of it, purpose and focus change (even if it is unintentional). Schools are marketing themselves using achievement test scores, facilities/amenities and athletics. What ever happened to judging a school by it's curriculum, quality of educators and track record for meeting students needs no matter where they fall on the academic scale? It seems to me that schools are trying hard to see how many students and families they can attract and enroll instead of making sure the students that are enrolled can think, communicate, write, comprehend, analyze, draw conclusions, and form new ideas of their own.

At the High School level the point seems to be all about preparing every student for college. This is a shift I think, but I cannot explain how it used to be because when I was in HS I too was being prepped for college. Can I say that I don't think everyone is cut out for college? Elitist snobbery at its best, right? Let me finish. Really though, do you think every student should be instructed the same way? Not everyone can be white collar executives or 9 to 5 specialist. Why? Because they just can't; the skill set and personality compatibility doesn't fit. It sounds so simple. Why make it hard? Generally speaking, HS students should have a feel for their natural gifts and abilities. At the very least, they should be well aware of their interests. Let's build on that educationally instead of forcing every student into the same mold. At this stage the fundamentals rule and I wonder if we're not pressing ahead so that SAT results are satisfactory and college entrance essays are crafted just right?

At the University level the emphasis seems to be the indoctrination of a particular political or religious point of view while doing job training for future employers. The University used to be for the elite minds, those who had an aptitude and interest in research and training in fields that maintain and advance society's systems as a whole. The best of the best were needed in areas such as government, law, medicine, business, philosophy, science and others I surely left out. It used to be a privilege to attend college, instead enrollment beyond HS graduation has become an entitlement. Now every college is crammed full and new ones are popping up just in time to get in on this new big business. Are we producing smarter, well-rounded young adults as a result?

Whose fault is it that education has gone this way? Has government interfered by trying to universalize learning? Let me answer that one--Yes. Where does the responsibility lie with parents? I can answer that one too. Parents (um, that's me now) are primarily responsible for the growth and development of children. Shame on us for not asking enough questions or being involved in the school experience. It's our fault for not nurturing and watching them grow; identifying their gifts and interests and then giving them opportunities to mature and excel in these areas.

I'm not angry. I'm a parent who wants to take control and do this thing right. The next generation demands my active participation and purposeful effort. I've written about this generational thing before as it pertains to financial stability. Read my post called FPU Lessons In Legacy to get more. Education is tied to occupation which is tied to standard of living, so changes on how we're doing education in this country has to change. By standard of living I don't mean rich, poor, or this un-defined or mis-defined category of middle class. I'm tired of the daily interactions with disgruntled and under performing people who'd rather be someplace else but aren't because the current educational climate beats them down with money, status, career, and standard of living hype. To have a high standard of living means to be living the life not that you've always dreamed of, but achieving what you CAN achieve and BE who you are naturally as gifted. My role as a parent (as established by myself) is to ensure the fundamentals are mastered and then help direct my children into their areas of giftedness and interest and then present them opportunities to develop the skills necessary to live the high life. This isn't going to be easy but I'm game.

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

RESET: On Church



It has been a good six weeks, a period of RESET. The first part is over now, evaluating what was known or understood and realizing there may be misunderstanding, erroneous ideas shaped by culture, or simply ignorance. The next step is re-knowing or learning for the first time those issues of Christian faith that are important in managing life. This secondary step may be the most difficult as the surrounding culture seems to communicate a message that is appealing but short-sighted and counter to God's plan, even under the best of intentions at times. I may try to unpack that later with another, separate post.

This it the last post in the RESET series and it ends with the church, a topic that has become a hot button for me the last several years. So for the sake of positive productivity and practicing a value my father always communicated, "If you can't say something nice then don't say it at all.", I will not say anything. Click here for the weekend message by Joe Boyd at Vineyard Community Church. He is a good teacher who communicates important spiritual truths in deep ways without theological snobbery or irrelevant, religious application. Joe says it much better than I ever could.

Saturday, April 11, 2009

Aslan, Resurrection, & Easter



"It means," said Aslan, "that though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a
magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the
dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back, into the
stillness and the darkness before Time dawned, she would have read there a
different incantation. She would have known that when a willing victim who had
committed no treachery was killed in a traitor's stead, the Table would crack
and Death itself would start working backward."
It's just like C.S. Lewis, author of The Lion, The Witch And The Wardrobe from which this excerpt is taken, to make light work of heavy theological concepts. Lewis is a master of simplicity; not watering down, but explaining in a way that is truly understandable. Here the concept is resurrection--from dead to live. Resurrection is a reversal of death and Lewis seems to define or describe resurrection as a dynamic reality that marches on bit by bit.
This profound simplicity makes me ask what may seem like ridiculous questions. Questions about increased life expectancy throughout history. The human race is living longer than ever before. I wonder about the idea of global warming and its spiritual implications. Are the climate changes the result of resurrection; God working toward the new Earth? Lewis does, after all, describe Narnia (pre-Aslan) as always winter and never Christmas.
Celebrating Easter makes me wonder about how Jesus' empty tomb goes beyond metaphorical symbolism describing the spiritual life. Not only did Jesus' resurrection defeat sin and offer a second chance morally but it set in motion a physical (actual) reality that "death would start working backward". Death kick-starts life and so shouldn't we expect to experience the sights and sounds of that new beginning?
The backtracking began and continues with the Christ. Jesus said to his inner circle as he appeared to them,
"Thus it is written, that the Christ would suffer and rise again from the dead
the third day, and that repentance for forgiveness of sins would be proclaimed
in His name to all the nations, beginning from Jerusalem. You are my
witnesses of these things. (Luke 24:46-48)

Monday, April 6, 2009

RESET: On Prayer

I continue the RESET series of posts which are my reflections from a city wide teaching series involving some 50 churches in the Cincinnati metro area. This teaching series includes a daily journal with action and reflection prompts, weekly small group gatherings, and weekly large group teachings at the various churches that are participating. Week five--'Jesus reset prayer.' I invite you to view/participate in the large group teaching time at Vineyard Community Church here for the week five lesson.

Prayer is one of those things that requires an extreme amount of discipline. Maybe it's just me, but my perception is that most people maintain a one dimensional line to God. In my reflections about my own personal prayer life I realize that I mostly pray when I need something. Whether that thing is health, conflict resolution, guidance toward a decision; I am motivated by my circumstances. What has happened to the relational aspect of prayer? God is not my 'go-to man' or my 'administrative assistant'. God is the creator of the universe which is to say he is my Lord, which means that there is a mutual desire to be in relationship. Prayer is a gesture toward God that reaches out for relationship. That is a single dimension to prayer--telling God what I need and want. It seems appropriate, after all, since God does cause all things to come into being.

There is a second dimension to prayer which connects to the first and makes this discipline complete. That dimension is to yield. It's one thing to trust God to provide our heart's desire but it is another to trust him with whatever else he has in mind for us that we've not thought of or asked for. In other words, yielding to God means to be open, persistent, and patient as you wait to hear God's response. The story Jesus tells of the persistent widow as recorded by Luke is helpful in understanding the yield dimension of relating to God. This is the hard part for me, the waiting patiently part. The 'want it now' culture, I'm sure, plays a role. I'm learning to change what prayer means practically in that it is not a religious exercise but a constant dialogue with God, a back and forth, on-going conversation.

So how does the practical application of the practice of prayer change how God feels in terms of his response to us? I'm not sure it changes anything for him but surely it changes our perspective when we practice with diligence the art of listening. There have been many times that I have prayed for something and quickly concluded in my mind that either God doesn't think I need it or that I don't deserve whatever it is. For me, to explain away a seemingly 'no response' from God is easier for my faith. It's hurts less than hearing a flat 'NO' from God or an alternative response that I'm not open to receive. This is where true discipline comes in; seeking and waiting, asking and receiving, yielding and listening.

I believe God answers prayer but not in a illusionist-audience way, but in a Father-Son way. I don't always get the answer I want because the possibility is strong that there is something better available to receive. I don't always get what I want within the schedule and circumstances I wish because there may be a more opportune time to receive it that is unknown to me. Prayer isn't about proving anything and God doesn't aim to please. God aims to communicate, heal, correct, empower, transform and regenerate.


Thursday, April 2, 2009

Skyline Vagabond Picks

It is common knowledge that the three most important aspects of real estate is LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION. When location is good, profitability is maximized. The same can be said of baseball pitchers. Success in pitchers is measured not by velocity of the pitches but by the number of outs generated. If you have watched enough baseball you've learned that a ball pitched in the middle of the strike zone is in danger of getting absolutely smashed no matter how hard it is thrown. Tom Glavine (seen above) has made a living and a HOF career of pitching to the corners.

Speaking of pitching, now that the steroid era is officially over I think MLB will retreat to a more historical version of the game that was lost during the drug years. More and more we will start to see the semblance of those 70's & 80's, Whitey Herzog type teams. I suspect the movement toward valuing defense and speed is underway. Throughout the 90's there was a blending of the two leagues in terms of style of play. It used to be that pitching and defense motivated the play in the N.L. while the sluggers were clustered in the A.L. The steroid era changed all that insomuch as every player could pop one out of the yard and each team had a player who was capable of putting up 40 dingers a year. Now that the players have more realistic levels of testosterone, other baseball skills besides power hitting will become revelant.

Now my picks for the 2009 season that begins on Sunday night. Remember, you heard it hear first.
National League
  • West: San Francisco Giants
  • Central: Chicago Cubs
  • East: Philadelphia Phillies
  • Wild Card: Atlanta Braves
American League
  • West: Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim
  • Central: (up for grabs but I'll pick) Minnesota Twins
  • East: Boston Red Sox
  • Wild Card: New York Yankees

Surprise teams:
  • Kansas City Royals (A.L.)
  • Cincinnati Reds (N.L.)
These teams, while not winning their respective divisions, will compete most of the summer up until the trading deadline.

World Series Winner: I hate picking the Yanks or Sox because it is the trendy thing to do. Plus these teams have the cash to add pieces at the trading deadline if they need to so it becomes the logical pick. When in doubt just go with your heart, right?
  • Atlanta Braves
Now it's your turn. Click the comments link below if you think you know more that me. Make your picks and take your licks.